History, U.S. History, World history, prehistory, geological history, Archaeology, Irish history, and history of many sorts. Much history can be sorted out by visiting our history timeline blogs. This also seems like place for essays on culture.
Monday, October 14, 2024
A Taste of the American Southwest
Sunday, March 5, 2023
The Ohlone
The Ohlone are from California. They have lived on the California coast from San Fransico bay to south of Santa Cruz. They have had a lot of relatives along the coast too, some called Lisan. They remember the earthquake which formed San Francisco Bay. That was bigger than the quake which caused San Fancisco to burn down. They and their relatives have lived in the area for a long time. Their ancesters passed down memories of being there since before "The Flood!"
While looking at old issue of the California magazine noted that University of California at Berkeley have been looking around the site of Quiroste, which was a large influencial Ohlone village at the time of discovery by Gaspar Portola. I understand that the Portola was more or less lost and unwell at the time. I also understand that the Oholone more or less saved their "discoverers."
Archaeological evidence shows that the area of Quiroste was successfuy inhabited from before 6,000 BC. So, it seems the Ohlone have been in what is now California for more than 8,000 years.
The Spaniards and early Californios called the Ohlne Costenyos. Oral histories and accounts from the early Mission Period seem to establish thatthe Quiroste site was widely known at that period as being an influential village rich in resources at that time.
The Berkeley project aroud Quiroste has been in collaboration with modern tribes such as the Muwekma, Native land management practices are at thecore of the research project. The plan for 2011 was to restore the flora of the area to the conditions found in 1769. I wonder why and how.
Native land management practices are becoming more appreciated as a source of information that is looking to be more and more valuable to our agricultural and land management in general. This appreciation has been true not only to Berkeley, but to all of the Americas and to much of the world in general. We do not see much about it on TV nor have we demanded it their. There is a lot about it online and at our universities.
That which we learn from native peoples, history, and prehistory may help us to more sucessfully adapt to changes on and to our Earth. As those changes have become more rapid than we have been accustomed to, the quality of our adaptive skills become more important.
It looks like we can learn significant skills from tribal people from tribal people from around the word as well as from our ancient and not so anchient ancesters.
It is widely known, among those interested, that Native Americans encouraged a great number of natural plants for harvest. Perhaps hunter-harvesters can prove a more useful term than hunter-gatherers. As a small example, Native Americans of California, not far from Quiroste site, practiced techniques for encouraging the growth of deer grass and sedges forharvest. And Hazelnut trees were protected and nourished by American Indians over a wide area of North America, including California.
The spellcheck app has disappeared and I have been unable to get it back. Please feel free to use the "comments" application below to correct our spelling. I can use all the help I can get. There are still some interesting apps available here to aid your exploration of this history blog.
Thank you for reading. There are also some videos here to view.
rcs
Friday, February 24, 2023
Chile and Chlenos, or Poets, Prussians, and Poppies
On rereading the notes for this posts, it seems that I am on a fishing expedition for comments related to the history of Chile and the Chilian people. This may be your big chance to teach me about Chile. I am not completely ignorant of Chile. For example, I know that it is probably the longest, narrowest country on our Earth. However I am courie0us about Chile and about what you know about that South American country and people and I have a lot to earn.
I know that they knew about the CIA before I did.
I find that there is evidence that the land which is now Chile was populated by about 40,000 BP; that's 40,000 years ago! That evidence, I believe, was discovered at the Mount Verde site. However, there is stronger evidence, at that same site, of human habitation dating to between 15,000 BP and 13,000 BP. There is evidence elsewhere in the country of agicultural cultivation. That early cultivation includes mountain side terracing and irrigation canals.
An example of an early culture are the Chinchoro people. Thheir culturs dates to about 7,000 BC. They were a sedentary fishing people of northern Chile on the Pacific coast of the great Atacama desert. They appear to have fished with both hook and net. They have some fame for their sophisticated mummification practices which may predate that practice in early Egypt.
I once held the opinion that Chileans may have been a bit too proud of their armed forces, including their navy. Now I am not so sure. I have learned a bit more and still have a lot to learn. A source of that pride be that in the War of the Pacifice they fought and defeated forcese of Argentina and of Peru both at about the same time. I felt that the army I saw there was a bit too much the style of Prussian regulars and too little like a democratic citizens' army.
At one time the Chileans seem to have seemed to have too much respect for the big and too little for the small. A big business was better than an small one and deserved more respect, a bigger industry deresed more respect than a smaller, latifundio was better than the family farm, and like that. Perhaps the small was not considered dispicable but nor was it an object of much pride.
Still, one might bet that there were enough rotos, huascos, Arucanos, and poets to to overcome the tendency to believe the the biggest was The best.
Sometimes the best post is the one which raises the most questions. I already have alot of questions. For example, Why has Chile had more California golden poppies than California?
I have lost the spellcheck app for this blog, or maby it was stolen. However, I still have a "comments" app here. You can find it here just below this little essay. You may find that it reads "no comments." click on it anyway. There, there is a place for your questions, answers, corrections of my errors, and yes, comments.
See if you can tell us the answer one or more of the following questions:
~ What was the War of the Pacific about,?
~ What did O'Higgins have to do with that war?
~ Who are rotos or what was a Chileno roto?
~ Who and what are huascos?
~ What are the names of more than one Chilean poet, poetresses count?
~ Can Gabi M. be a hint to the name of one of them?
~ What can you say about the Arucanos.
~ Who were the native people who lived south of the Arucano.
~ Where in Chile is the Mount Verde site
Try commenting, you may love it. You can comment here with out providing your email address.
Thank you for reading
There are a variety of posts, videos, and essays right here on this blog. You have the power to explore them.
rcs
Saturday, January 29, 2022
Snake War: A short version
By 1850 powerful and influential men from around the world became interested in the American West. We might blame that on the Fortyniners and gold fever. The name, California became a sort of magnet which drew men from from east of the the Mississippi and the Pacific coast. That same magnet drew men around the Horn and through the Straights of Magellan: some crossed the Pacific ocean from the Far East to get to California. That magnet drew men and their capital and during the Civil War and drew them even more strongly after that war of Americans against Americans.
In 1864 the Snake War began and then continued until 1868. Their were other U.S. wars (from about 1861 to 1868) during this same time. There were: Texas-Indian wars, a Colorado war, Apache wars, California Indian wars, and a Cheyenne Campaign! Many were sure that "good Indians were dead Indians." Indians were to put their heads down, in a dirty corner of what had once been their America the Beautiful, or die.
Historians called the Snake War an irregular war which Americans fought against the Northern Paiute, the Bannock,
and the Western Shoshone. Some of that fighting was done along the Snake river. When historians used the word "irregular" they were being diplomatic. This war took place in what became the states of Oregon, Nevada, California, and Idaho. The U.S. Won.
The war began when many small bands of the tribes mentioned above were disturbed by the activities of people of the mining interests and the new road building interests digging in the lands from which those Indians were accustomed to take their sustenance. Significant numbers of those Indians were made "good." Some Indians were able to make a few interlopers "good" too.
Powerful and influential persons were interested in the undeveloped lands of the U.S. Monied people in California, on the US. East Coast. and elsewhere were interested in the lead, copper, gold, and silver. They were interested in the prime lands of the Far west of what was becoming the U.S.
The were interested in the resources the Mississippi and the Pacific Ocean. They saw an access to a toad to greater wealth.
There were those who had the the resources to apply pressure where needed to see that the natives of the land did not hinder their plans. California interests brought pressure to bear on' general George Wright, commander of the department of the Pacific, to provide better protection for those building the new roads from from Red Bluff and Chico to Silver City and Boise. "Do something about those Indians," they were demanding. It would take a book to cover all the powerful pressures brought to bear to clear the way to wealth. Still we can stay that much of those pressures had to do with money, wealth, power, and the growing craft of Public Relations, the selling of ideas which move the public.
In the States, a growing number of strong pressures were being felt by men in positions to act on the will of the men with the power to put effective power on them. Pressures acted on Congressmen, large contractors, railroad men, world wide mining interests: capitalists from the
East Coast, the West Coast, and around our world. There were high hopes and a great deal of pushing and shoving. The people felt these activities.
The War consisted mostly of hunting Indians. Volunteers hunted Indians, interested citizens hunted Indians, immigrants hunted Indians, the Army hunted Indians. Some said that the Indians were in the way of destiny.
by Richard Sheehan
Should I start to think of learning to copyright my work?
I look forward to your comments, questions, additions corrections, criticisms, and praise.